Michigan Divorce Lawyer - Michigan Divorce Attorney - CTZ Law

Divorce cases are often difficult and emotionally difficult and draining for all parties
involved. It is important to have an experienced and qualified divorce attorney who is sensitive to your needs, and
who can formulate a plan to protect your rights and assets. At Canu,
Torrice & Zalewski, PLLC, our attorneys are sensitive to your needs, but will aggressively protect your rights,
property and children from an unreasonable spouse.
"No Fault" Divorce
Michigan has enacted a no fault divorce law, pursuant to which residents of Michigan can obtain a
divorce without establishing that the other party did something wrong. A trial court can grant a divorce if
it finds that "There has been a breakdown in the marriage relationship to the extent that the objects of
matrimony have been destroyed and there remains no reasonable likelihood that the marriage can be preserved."
Although issues of "fault" may remain relevant to the division of the marital estate, and that aspects of
"fault" may come out in the event of child custody litigation.
Jurisdictional Requirements
To file for divorce in Michigan, the plaintiff must have been a resident of Michigan for at
least 180 days, and must have resided in the county where the divorce complaint was filed for at least ten days
prior to filing.
If the other spouse resides in another state, the Michigan court will be able to grant a
valid divorce, but may be limited in its ability to divide property or determine custody and child support.
However, it is possible for a spouse who lives in another state to consent to having all divorce-related issues
decided by the Michigan court.
If you are concerned that your spouse may be filing for divorce in another state or
jurisdiction, you should consult with one of our attorneys about whether it would be appropriate for you to try to
file a divorce in your own state. In many circumstances, the divorce will be decided in the state where a complaint
for divorce is first filed, which can result in significant difficulty and expense to a spouse who resides in
another state.
Waiting Period
Under normal circumstances, a trial court in Michigan must observe a sixty day "cooling off"
period before granting a divorce. While it is possible for a trial court to find circumstances which justify
waiving this period, in most cases the full waiting period will be observed. The waiting period is longer in
cases involving child custody.
When "Fault" Matters
A trial court may consider "fault" issues when dividing the marital assets, or when assessing
spousal support (alimony). Please note that under most "fault" circumstances, the trial court will not dramatically
change the division of assets. With most marital estates, you will need to consider whether a five or ten percent
difference in the property division justifies the expense and conflict associated with attempting to prove fault.
There is often a better financial return in making sure that all assets are located, properly valued, and included
in the marital estate, as opposed to trying to prove fault.
Please note that while the five or ten percent difference is most typical, in
extreme cases courts
have been known to award larger amounts, and on at least one occasion even the entire marital estate, to the
wronged spouse. Our attorneys can help you make the assessment of what is likely to happen in your case, and
whether you would benefit from trying to make fault an issue.
Division of Property
The first consideration for a court in evaluating the division of the marital estate is the
determination of which portions of the estate constitute the parties' separate property, and which is part of the
marital estate. By way of example, inheritances are usually considered to be the separate property of the spouse
who received the inheritance. Similarly, a business or asset owned prior to the marriage may be considered to be a
separate asset, depending upon how it was treated during the marriage. At times, an item of property might be
deemed to be "separate property", while the appreciation or interest earned by the asset is considered to be a
marital asset. At other times, a parties separate property at the onset of the marriage may be deemed to have
merged into the marital estate. Also, a trial court may invade one spouse's separate property when necessary to
provide for the adequate post-divorce support of the other spouse.
Factors to be considered by the trial court when dividing the
marital estate include:
- The parties' past relations and conduct;
- The duration of the marriage;
- The source of property;
- The parties' contribution towards its acquisition;
- The needs of the parties;
- The parties' earning ability;
- The cause for divorce;
- The age of the parties;
- The parties' health;
- The parties' life status;
- Necessities and circumstances of the parties;
- General principles of equity (fairness); and
- Additional factors deemed relevant to a particular case.
Spousal Support / Alimony
An award of spousal support is ordinarily made within the context of the division of the
parties' property and assets. Under appropriate circumstances, a trial court may provide for temporary spousal
support while a divorce case is pending, or may order support to be paid retroactive to the date the complaint for
divorce was filed. A spousal support award may take into consideration the amount of marital estate, and whether
one of the spouses will have to liquidate assets awarded in the divorce in order to maintain a reasonable
lifestyle. Where one spouse has sufficient income to preserve his or her share of the property settlement and the
other does not, spousal support may be appropriate.
Spousal support is usually awarded either in the form of periodic payments or "in gross" (in a
lump sum). Periodic payments are usually described as "rehabilitative" (short-term payments to help the recipient
spouse get back on his or her feet), or permanent (ordinarily lasting until death, remarriage, or further order of
the court). Awards of periodic alimony are normally subject to subsequent modification by the court, whereas awards
of alimony in gross ordinarily cannot be modified after judgment.
Factors to be considered by a trial court in awarding spousal
support include:
- Past relations and conduct of parties;
- Length of the marriage;
- Age of the parties;
- Ability to work;
- Present situation of parties;
- Needs of the parties;
- Health of the parties;
- Ability to pay alimony;
- Source and amount of property awarded the parties;
- Prior standard of living of the parties and whether either is responsible for the support
of others; and
- General principles of equity (fairness)
There are at least two sets of unofficial spousal support guidelines available in Michigan.
Courts will usually entertain calculations made under the guidelines, but the guidelines are not binding on the
court.
Bankruptcy and Divorce
If there is a possibility that one or both spouses will file for bankruptcy after the divorce,
an attorney must take particular care to structure the property division and support award so as to protect the
client spouse from the effects of the other spouse's bankruptcy. If either spouse has filed or is considering the
filing of a bankruptcy, you should contact our office for a joint consultation with our bankruptcy and divorce
attorneys to being advised of your rights and the possible effect on your case.
Child Custody
The "Best Interest Factors"
When evaluating child custody, under Michigan law courts are required to evaluate the "best
interest" factors, a series of considerations which are meant to help the court determine the most appropriate
custodial environment for a child. Those factors include:
(a) The love, affection, and other emotional ties existing between the parties involved and the
child.
(b) The capacity and disposition of the parties involved to give the child love, affection, and
guidance and to continue the education and raising of the child in his or her religion or creed, if any.
(c) The capacity and disposition of the parties involved to provide the child with food,
clothing, medical care or other remedial care recognized and permitted under the laws of this state in place of
medical care, and other material needs.
(d) The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment, and the
desirability of maintaining continuity.
(e) The permanence, as a family unit, of the existing or proposed custodial home or homes.
(f) The moral fitness of the parties involved.
(g) The mental and physical health of the parties involved.
(h) The home, school, and community record of the child.
(i) The reasonable preference of the child, if the court considers the child to be of sufficient age
to express preference.
(j) The willingness and ability of each of the parties to facilitate and encourage a close and
continuing parent-child relationship between the child and the other parent or the child and the parents.
(k) Domestic violence, regardless of whether the violence was directed against or witnessed by
the child.
(l) Any other factor considered by the court to be relevant to a particular child custody
dispute.
Please note that, while a court will make specific findings under each "best interest" factor
when rendering a custody decision, the court's findings are not tallied up like a baseball score. It may be that
one party "wins" under most of the factors, but that custody is awarded to the other party on the basis of a factor
the trial court considers to be more important under the circumstances. For example, a judge may be sufficiently
concerned about a parent who appears to wish to alienate the child from the other parent, that custody will be
awarded to the other parent under a strong "factor j" finding, despite the many good qualities of the first parent.
Similarly, "factor b" and "factor c" findings may be given considerable weight by a court, if a parent appears
unwilling or unable to provide appropriate guidance or support.
The issue of "morality" relates to the effect of the parent's moral choices on the children. It
is not intended to include an evaluation of a parent's character outside of the context of the best interests of
the children, and the ability of the parent to provide appropriate moral guidance to the children. A parent's
involvement in a new romantic relationship following divorce or separation is not the type of "moral conduct" which
would ordinarily concern a court.
Modification of Custody
Once a trial court has entered a custody order, the trial court is not supposed to revisit that
order unless the party requesting modification can establish a "change of circumstances" sufficient to reopen the
prior custody decision. The idea behind this rule is that minor children need stability in their lives, and thus
that modification of custody is not appropriate if there has been no significant change in their existing custodial
environment. A lawyer can help you evaluate if there have been sufficient changes to warrant an effort to change or
modify custody.
Interstate Custody Issues
Interstate custody disputes typically arise when a parent who lives with the children in
Michigan files for divorce in a Michigan court, or when a parent who was divorced in a different state
seeks to modify that state's child custody judgment in a Michigan court. In the first circumstance, a
Michigan court will be able to grant a divorce and issue a custody order, but may be restricted in its ability
to divide marital assets or to award child support without the other parent's consent to its jurisdiction. In the
second circumstance, there are some relatively complicated rules which are meant to protect the jurisdiction of the
court which issued the original custody order, which may prevent a Michigan court from modifying that order.
If there are interstate issues in your custody case, due to the complications that can result, it is a good idea to
consult with a lawyer about their impact on your case.
Calculation of Child Support
Child support is ordinarily calculated in accord with the Michigan Child Support Formula. This
calculation is formulaic, and except in high income cases does not leave much room for advocacy. Child support is
ordinarily payable until a child reaches the age of eighteen, or until the age of 19-1/2 if the child is still a
full-time high school student. Please note that the parties can agree to additional support provisions on a
contractual basis, for example if they wish to provide for their children's college education as part of the
divorce agreement, or if they have a disabled child whom they know will require support well past the age of
majority.
If you are paying or receiving child support, and your financial circumstances change, you may
ask the court to modify the amount of child support payable in your case. Please note that under normal
circumstances a court will be unable to modify support "retroactively" - that is, any change will ordinarily take
effect as of the date of your petition for a modification. It is thus important that you present any challenge to
excessive or inadequate support as soon as the changed circumstances come to your attention.
Joint Custody
There are two types of "joint custody" in Michigan - "joint legal custody", under which
parents share decision-making responsibility in relation to important life decisions affecting the child, and
"joint physical custody", which usually involves a more equal parenting time arrangement and shared responsibility
for the day-to-day care of the child. A Michigan court must consider joint custody if asked to do so by either
parent. Most custody cases result in an award of joint legal custody. Joint physical custody works best when the
parents have a strong relationship and ability to communicate in relation to their minor children, despite the
circumstances of their divorce.
Moving After a Custody Order
Custodial parents who are subject to a
Michigan custody order are expected to seek permission from the trial court before relocating the children to
another state. Where the parents with either joint physical or joint legal custody live within 100 miles of each
other at the time of the initial custody order, either parent must petition the court before they move beyond that
100 mile limit
|